To the Editor:
David Toyer’s letter opposing Everett Initiative 24-03 (Oct. 23 Tribune letters) raises questionable intentions. As a key figure behind the developer-funded PAC opposing this initiative, his motives are clear: to maintain the status quo that benefits developers at the expense of our environment.
Toyer’s claims about the initiative’s negative impacts are exaggerated and misleading. Initiative 24-03 empowers the community to defend its watershed in court, providing essential protections for our ecosystem. His assertion that it would lead to frivolous lawsuits is unfounded; our legal system has safeguards to ensure that only valid, serious environmental harms are pursued. Additionally, any funds awarded in lawsuits would go directly to the City of Everett for restoration efforts, not to individuals.
To suggest that prioritizing the health of our watershed will lead to reduced services or higher taxes is misleading. Protecting our natural resources is crucial for flood control, water quality, and overall community well-being. A healthy watershed is essential for the entire community’s function.
Toyer’s focus on preserving the status quo reflects the interests of developers, who are the primary opposition to this initiative and stand to gain from current practices. In contrast, voting yes on Initiative 24-03 is a vote for sustainable development and responsible stewardship. It’s an opportunity to secure a healthier future for our community and ensure that we protect the environment for generations to come.
Abi Ludwig
Olympia
Campaign Rep for Everett Initiative 24-03
